ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To develop and investigate the reliability and validity of a Brazilian version of the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. METHODS: A Brazilian version of the questionnaire was developed and applied to patients with chronic eye diseases and healthy controls. Reliability was assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient and interrater reliability coefficient. Participants were submitted to the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Questionnaire. Validity was estimated by the correlation between the questionnaires and among the 12 subscales of the questionnaire, subscales scores and visual acuity, patients' and controls' subscales scores, and the factor analysis. Responsiveness of the questionnaire was assessed in a group of patients before and following cataract surgery. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha, intraclass correlation and interrater reliability coefficients were highly significant. Validity was well established in all tests. In patients who underwent cataract surgery, a better vision-related quality of life was observed following surgery. CONCLUSION: The Brazilian version of the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire has valid and reliable psychometric properties and can be applied to vision-related quality of life research.
OBJETIVO: Desenvolver e investigar a confiabilidade e a validade da versão brasileira do Questionário de Função Visual de 25 Itens do National Eye Institute. MÉTODOS: A versão brasileira do questionário foi desenvolvida e aplicada em pacientes com doenças oculares crônicas e controles sadios. A confiabilidade foi calculada pelo coeficiente alfa de Cronbach de correlação intraclasse e de confiabilidade entre examinadores. Foi usado o questionário "The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36". A validade foi calculada pela correlação entre as escalas dos questionários e entre as 12 subescalas do questionário, a pontuação das subescalas e a acuidade visual, a pontuação das subescalas de pacientes e controles e a análise fatorial. A validação do questionário foi calculada em grupo de pacientes antes e após cirurgia de catarata. RESULTADOS: O coeficiente de alfa de Cronbach, de correlação intraclasse e de variação entre entrevistadores, e os testes de validade da versão brasileira foram significantes. A responsividade foi confirmada pela melhora na qualidade de vida visual no grupo submetido à cirurgia de catarata. CONCLUSÃO: A versão brasileira do Questionário de Função Visual de 25 Itens apresenta propriedades psicométricas válidas e confiáveis e pode ser aplicado em pesquisa de qualidade de vida visual.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Eye Diseases/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Translations , Analysis of Variance , Brazil , Case-Control Studies , Chronic Disease , Cataract Extraction/psychology , National Eye Institute (U.S.) , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Time Factors , United States , Visual Acuity/physiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
We conducted 24 focus group discussions for parents and grandparents as part of a population-based survey of ocular morbidity to determine awareness and perceptions of eye diseases in children among parents and guardians of children in a rural south Indian population. Focus group discussions were conducted separately for mothers, fathers and grandparents. They were audiotaped and subsequently transcribed to the local language and English. Content analysis of the focus group discussions was done to identify key concepts, and this yielded five broad areas of interest relating to awareness and attitudes towards: 1) eye problems in children, 2) specific eye diseases in children, 3) vision problems in children, 4) existing health practices, and 5) utilization of services. Vision impairment did not figure in the top ten eye problems cited for children. There was a predominant belief that children below 4 years should not wear spectacles. Strabismus was considered as untreatable and was seen as a sign of good luck. Differing advice provided by the medical community for the same condition was an issue. The discussions also brought out that eye doctors were approached last for eye care, after traditional healers and general physicians. The discussions raise several issues of relevance that eye care programs need to address for better community involvement with programs. This will require a far greater focus than the current curative focus adopted by most programs.